Oil Sands or Tar Sands? A sticky subject

• 

Details

Published on Monday, 24 March 2014 12:00

Written by editor

Oil Sands or Tar Sands? A sticky subject - This Weeks Dose of Common Sense r33
When Pulitzer Prize-winning American author Tony Horwitz visited Fort MacMurray to research a new book, he noted, "It quickly became clear to me that saying ‘tar sands’ would tar me as a hostile environmentalist. So, I began to say ‘oil sands’." This week, we examine the PR wars over Alberta bitumen - a sticky subject that merits a rethink, given the water, climate and ecological implications behind the various names we give it.

Meanwhile, DC Reid sinks his shovel into the piles of waste coming out of open net pen salmon farms on BC's coast - a cost borne by the public and environment which he tags at a billion dollars a year.

Finally, BC isn't the only Canadian province getting into the liquefied natural gas game, as Nova Scotia recently approved a new LNG terminal on its coast.

Cheers,



Damien Gillis
Publisher Oil Sands or Tar Sands? Actually, they’re neither

The issue of what to call Alberta's oil patch is an increasingly sticky subject.



Read More Fish farm sewage: DFO expansions cost you money

DC Reid suggests waste from salmon farms cost BC's environment and public $1 billion a year, despite the paltry economic benefits the industry yields.
Read More Nova Scotia approves LNG plant

Nova Scotia granted conditional approval Friday to a proposed liquefied natural gas plant in Goldboro, clearing another hurdle for the terminal that's slated to be operational in six years. Read More Copyright © 2014 Common Sense Media Ltd., All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website, one of our social media pages or at a Common Sense Canadian sponsored event.

Our mailing address is:
Common Sense Media Ltd.4A - 34 Powell StVancouver, BC V6A 1E7 Canada
r34 r35