Time to pop the champagne!
By Emma Gilchrist and Carol Linnitt
On Monday, the British Columbia government introduced new legislation that proposes to ban corporate, union and foreign donations in a move that will dramatically change B.C.’s political landscape and bring the province in line with other Canadian jurisdictions.
We answer your Top 5 questions on the ban. Read more.
By Judith Lavoie
Essential information on Arctic climate change, ozone depletion and pollution reaching the Arctic from B.C.’s recent forest fires will be lost unless the federal government comes through with funding to save Canada’s unique high Arctic research station. Read more.
By Shannon Daub and Zoë Yunker
Newly uncovered documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests reveal the cozy relationship between the fossil fuel industry and the last B.C. government went even further than suspected — all the way to inviting industry to directly craft the province’s climate “leadership” plan. Read more.
By Emma Gilchrist and Carol Linnitt
Judges for the Canadian Online Publishing Awards have announced the 2017 finalists and DeSmog Canada has made the cut in two categories.
In the category of “Best Continuing Coverage of a News Story” DeSmog Canada was selected as a finalist for its reporting on the Site C dam, alongside Maclean’s, VICE News, The Tyee/Discourse Media and the National Observer. Read more.
By Carol Linnitt
Documents released on Monday reveal that B.C.’s climate plan under the previous Liberal government was drafted by the oil and gas industry in a Calgary boardroom, just as the province’s new NDP government moves to ban corporate and union donations to B.C. political parties.
"Reading these documents gives us some real insight into how it is that these kinds of donations can buy not just access to government but access to actually writing policy,” UBC political scientist Max Cameron said. Read more.
By Judith Lavoie
A submission to the B.C. Utilities Commission by renowned hydroelectric consultant Robert McCullough has concluded that renewables could meet B.C.’s power needs at a much lower cost than Site C.
Calls for construction to be halted were buoyed by McCullough's analysis, which concluded that terminating Site C and building a renewable portfolio of wind and geothermal would save between $700 million and $1.6 billion. r34.