If I had $2 billion dollars

If I had $2 billion dollars r1 ... Subscribe to this newsletter narwhal logo BECOME A MEMBER Placer mining activity along Indian River near Quartz Creek in Yukon
Things we love: Klondike ice cream bars.

Things we don’t love: Klondike Gold Rush-era mining laws.

So, what’s the deal?

The Klondike Gold Rush hit Yukon like a storm in the late 1800s and the territory had to develop its mining rules during an absolute flood of prospectors (they were actually called stampeders), gold pans in hand. Thing is, long after most of those miners left, the laws remained.

One such law from 1906 stipulates gold miners only have to pay the Yukon government 37.5 cents for each ounce of gold they extract, based on a gold price of $15 per ounce.

That pricing scheme remains in place even though the current market value for an ounce of gold is more than $2,300.

These antiquated royalty prices result in laughably low payments to the First Nations from whose territory the gold is extracted. One nation received an annual royalty cheque for $6. Or, about the price of a four-pack of Klondike ice cream bars.

The broken state of the royalty system is highlighted in a series of recommendations from an independent panel tasked with reviewing the Yukon government’s mining legislation. The panel found that, all told, miners in Yukon have paid out only $100,000 per year in royalties over the past decade while extracting minerals with a yearly value of $335 million. That means Yukon is collecting just 0.3 per cent of the value of its mineral resources.

The Yukon government has vowed to bring its outdated mining legislation into the 21st century.

“There are going to be detrimental effects [from mining],” Math’ieya Alatini, a member of the independent panel, told The Narwhal’s Julien Gignac. “These minerals are not going to be returned to the ground. … How do we adequately compensate this generation and future generations for the loss of use?”

Yukon isn’t the only region in Canada facing a wake-up call over its royalty regime. B.C. has its own royalty woes that mean the province brings in more revenue from tobacco taxes than from its massive natural gas industry.

What gives?

Reporter Ainslie Cruickshank sifted through four years of budget documents and found companies claimed $1 billion more in special natural gas royalty credits than the province had anticipated. In total, B.C. lost out on more than $2 billion in revenues over four years as a result of its credit program.

“The intended way this is supposed to work is natural resources like gas belong to all British Columbians and the province is supposed to balance the need to stimulate the industry with getting a fair price for British Columbia — and that’s not happening anymore,” Sven Biggs, Canadian oil and gas programs director with Stand.earth, told The Narwhal.

During B.C.’s 2020 election campaign, the NDP promised a comprehensive review of the royalty credit program. We’re still waiting for word on when and how that’s going to happen.

In Yukon, residents can submit feedback on plans for mining development, including the royalty system, through Feb. 22. A final strategy is set to be delivered to the government and First Nations the following month.

Take care and please collect more than $200 when you pass Go,

Arik Ligeti
Audience engagement editor
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

P.S. This is your final reminder to sign up for our upcoming Carbon Cache event! It’s going to be a rad look at big solutions to big climate problems. You don’t want to miss it. Save the date for Feb. 2 and go here to claim your spot. Webinar invite Carbon Cache

The Narwhal in The New Yorker
Guess who just shouted out The Narwhal’s first-rate reporting? None other than Mr. Bill McKibben in The New Yorker’s climate newsletter. Outlining the state of affairs of oil pipelines, McKibben wrote that “a United Nations commission chastised the Canadian government for not getting buy-in from First Nations on various pipeline and energy-development plans.”

The Narwhal’s Sarah Cox penned the very first story on the UN rebuke of Canada, and McKibben made sure to link out to her piece. Here’s why the human rights body says Canada is failing to comply with international law when it comes to projects like the Coastal GasLink pipeline, the Trans Mountain pipeline and the Site C dam.

The ’whal on the ’gram Instagram screengrab The Narwhal's editor-in-chief Emma Gilchrist holding surfboard Hear ye, hear ye: the word is out about The Narwhal’s awesome Instagram account — will you join us over there? We’ve got live videos, we’ve got memes and, of course, we’ve got bonus pics from The Narwhal’s signature award-winning photo journalism. Smash that follow button and start scrolling! BECOME A NARWHAL This week in The Narwhal

Natural gas royalty credits cost B.C. $1 billion more than expected over last four years

B.C. oil field By Ainslie Cruickshank

B.C. collects far more money from tobacco taxes than natural gas royalties. The credit program is a big reason why. Read more.

‘Nothing should be kept secret’: B.C. First Nation asks court to order release of Site C dam safety documents

The unit one turbine runner being transported to the Site C dam construction site By Sarah Cox
Site C construction continues at an estimated cost of $3 million a day amid growing concerns about the stability of the dam and secrecy from BC Hydro and the B.C. government, which is withholding a recent status report on the over-budget project from the public. Read more.

Canada doesn’t have a carbon budget. Here’s what that means and why it matters

Acadian forest woodlot in Douglas Harbour, N.B. By Matt Simmons
As a new study finds we’re a decade away from blowing our global carbon budget, scientists say Canada could improve its accountability by doing some climate accounting. Read more.

What we’re reading Globe and Mail series: This is the Power Gap Ricochet article: With Keystone XL cancelled, all eyes turn to Trans Mountain expansion battle Leslie Knope Parks and Recreation gif: When you’re trying to modernize public lands legislation. Tell your fellow constituents to get with the program and sign up for our newsletter. r33

Copyright © 2021 The Narwhal, all rights reserved.
You are on this list because you signed up to receive The Narwhal’s newsletter.

Our mailing address is:
The Narwhal
Suite 634
185 - 911 Yates St.
Victoria, BC V8V 4Y9

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can r71 or r34.

This email was sent to s6
why did I get this? r34 r35
The Narwhal · Suite 634 · 185 - 911 Yates St. · Victoria, BC V8V 4Y9 · Canada


Login Form