10 Things Canada Would Be Doing if We Were Serious About Climate Change
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 24 December 2014 14:00
- Written by editor
Like 
Tweet 
Forward
Guest Posts & In-Depth Analysis Bill C-46 Could Transform Pipeline Liability Law in Canada. But Will it Be for the Better?
Proposed pipeline liability regime steps in the right direction, but leaves too much wiggle room for polluters.
At this very moment, Canada’s liability regime is woefully inadequate when it comes to making sure that polluters pay in the event of a pipeline rupture or oil spill. That means that Canadian taxpayers like you would shoulder an inappropriate degree of the risk in the event of a serious pipeline accident, like Enbridge’s Kalamazoo River spill in Michigan.
With one click you can be following DeSmog Canada's tweets!
The Sometimes Rocky Relationship Between Charities and the Canadian Government
In the last three years, many within the charitable sector have become concerned about Canada Revenue Agency audits focused on political activities, but few realize that controversy over the regulation of charities dates back decades in our country.
10 Things Canada Would Be Doing if We Were Serious About Climate Change
Recently Canada participated in the 20th annual United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Lima, Peru. The country already caught flack for thinking a progressive stance on hydrofluorocarbons will convince the international community Canada is doing its due diligence when it comes to the world’s problem of growing greenhouse gas emissions. To make matters worse, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced in the House of Commons that it would be “crazy” to regulate emissions in Canada’s oil and gas sector, signaling the long-overdue rules are no longer on the table. READ MORE
Questionable Development Leads to Delay in Jumbo Glacier Resort Approval
A provincial delay in deciding whether construction of Jumbo Glacier Resort has substantially started is giving hope to opponents that close scrutiny will lead to the province yanking the resort’s environmental assessment certificate.
“It seems impossible to me that a minister with even the slightest self-respect could look at this and proceed with it,” said Norm Macdonald, Columbia River-Revelstoke MLA. READ MORE
B.C. Government Gives Go-Ahead to Site C Dam, But Fight Far From Over
The moment I caught wind that the B.C. government’s decision on the Site C dam was coming down, my mind gravitated to Ken and Arlene Boon’s farm in the Peace River valley.
If the Site C dam is built, as the B.C. government announced recently it will be, much of the Boon’s 640-acre farm will be underwater as part of the 55 square kilometres of river valley that will be flooded.
You wouldn't think dozens of farmers and ranchers are going to lose their livelihoods based on the tone of Tuesday's press conference. The event to announce the go-ahead for the most expensive project in B.C. history was a BC Hydro love-in, full of pats on the back for the leaders of the project.
Fracking Bans in Quebec and New York Should Give B.C. Premier Christy Clark Pause
Two big blows to the natural gas industry have come in less than 24 hours, with both the province of Quebec and New York state effectively banning shale gas extraction over concerns with the process of hydraulic fracturing (a.k.a. “fracking”). r15 |r0
